Skip to content

feat(propagation): add support for otel consistent sampling - #8983

Draft
MilanGarnier wants to merge 12 commits into
masterfrom
milan.garnier/ot.th
Draft

feat(propagation): add support for otel consistent sampling#8983
MilanGarnier wants to merge 12 commits into
masterfrom
milan.garnier/ot.th

Conversation

@MilanGarnier

@MilanGarnier MilanGarnier commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of changes

Reason for change

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] Extract ComputeKnuthHash helper from SampleByRate
eaf7035
@MilanGarnier
[Propagators] Add OtelTraceStateHelpers for ot= rv/th string surgery
e5ad3a6
@MilanGarnier
[Propagators] Capture raw ot= tracestate member on extract
3b37bb9
@MilanGarnier
[Propagators] Plumb OtelTraceState through SpanContext/TraceContext e…
f208d1e 
…xtraction
@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] Thread raw probability outcome through SamplingDecision
c3c8ee5
@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] Add test coverage for SamplingDecision.Sample field
add50d9
@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] Derive ot.rv/ot.th on root probability decisions
7a64d52
@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] Clamp ot.th/ot.rv to 56-bit domain at rate boundaries
3d85e18
@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] erase inherited ot.th on Manual/ASM priority overrides
05a5bec
@MilanGarnier
[Propagators] Emit ot= tracestate member on inject, after dd=
9a1959e
@MilanGarnier
[Propagators] Add RFC A1-A6 conformance tests for ot= tracestate hand…
2753893 
…ling
@MilanGarnier
[Sampling] Fix ksr tag-count test drift, guard NaN sampling rate, upd…
486a578 
…ate stale doc comment
@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-03 15:44:17

Comparing candidate commit 486a578 in PR branch milan.garnier/ot.th with baseline commit 3643d74 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 48 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 24 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 112 known flaky benchmarks, 14 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59091.044op/s; -57596.417op/s] or [-32.126%; -31.313%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-77383.183op/s; -74466.247op/s] or [-27.084%; -26.063%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-51309.848op/s; -50204.730op/s] or [-24.546%; -24.017%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-57194.769op/s; -55996.051op/s] or [-31.394%; -30.736%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-70094.227op/s; -66155.217op/s] or [-25.469%; -24.038%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-58622.075op/s; -56402.631op/s] or [-27.506%; -26.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59742.351op/s; -57949.890op/s] or [-32.689%; -31.708%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-70740.955op/s; -66883.954op/s] or [-25.461%; -24.073%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-53637.511op/s; -51050.586op/s] or [-25.490%; -24.261%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-55923.357op/s; -54869.043op/s] or [-31.302%; -30.712%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-68290.887op/s; -64289.865op/s] or [-24.792%; -23.339%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-55756.363op/s; -53583.702op/s] or [-26.541%; -25.507%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+15.612%; +15.620%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56505.934op/s; -55615.445op/s] or [-33.079%; -32.558%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+15.277%; +15.285%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-58829.426op/s; -56077.160op/s] or [-23.271%; -22.183%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+14.889%; +14.897%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-46159.456op/s; -43883.345op/s] or [-23.484%; -22.326%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+344 bytes; +345 bytes] or [+36.425%; +36.437%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154565.331op/s; -151981.518op/s] or [-43.534%; -42.806%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+29.259%; +29.271%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-180518.047op/s; -169854.068op/s] or [-34.251%; -32.228%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+29.499%; +29.510%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-139273.775op/s; -131297.700op/s] or [-34.425%; -32.453%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+392 bytes; +393 bytes] or [+13.494%; +13.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-20158.011op/s; -19878.059op/s] or [-23.012%; -22.692%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+319 bytes; +320 bytes] or [+15.091%; +15.103%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-25762.360op/s; -23847.403op/s] or [-17.501%; -16.200%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+319 bytes; +320 bytes] or [+12.113%; +12.124%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-26945.761op/s; -25697.735op/s] or [-21.383%; -20.392%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+352 bytes; +353 bytes] or [+17.087%; +17.099%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-30348.916op/s; -29614.536op/s] or [-23.248%; -22.686%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+295 bytes; +296 bytes] or [+13.090%; +13.101%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-34227.066op/s; -29482.360op/s] or [-17.162%; -14.783%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+295 bytes; +296 bytes] or [+13.022%; +13.035%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-29690.223op/s; -24623.977op/s] or [-19.933%; -16.532%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+20.480%; +20.488%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-62082.581op/s; -60817.669op/s] or [-31.481%; -30.839%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.883%; +19.892%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-69296.009op/s; -63769.140op/s] or [-24.308%; -22.369%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.228%; +19.237%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59396.054op/s; -56177.075op/s] or [-26.647%; -25.202%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+17.204%; +17.212%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49992.602op/s; -48820.713op/s] or [-28.680%; -28.007%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+16.353%; +16.361%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-71872.886op/s; -69325.919op/s] or [-27.726%; -26.744%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+15.905%; +15.915%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-50638.532op/s; -48772.442op/s] or [-25.460%; -24.522%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+20.480%; +20.488%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59849.078op/s; -58638.303op/s] or [-30.779%; -30.156%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.883%; +19.892%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73145.783op/s; -69359.150op/s] or [-25.249%; -23.942%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.228%; +19.237%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-58843.610op/s; -56472.530op/s] or [-27.185%; -26.089%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +336 bytes] or [+15.491%; +15.500%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-46007.961op/s; -44942.173op/s] or [-29.391%; -28.711%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+14.579%; +14.588%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48971.973op/s; -46751.550op/s] or [-22.139%; -21.135%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+14.220%; +14.230%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-44341.315op/s; -42560.418op/s] or [-24.620%; -23.631%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+20.480%; +20.488%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-69939.148op/s; -68324.830op/s] or [-33.804%; -33.023%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.883%; +19.892%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-81525.943op/s; -77684.679op/s] or [-27.005%; -25.732%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.228%; +19.237%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-58877.672op/s; -56197.670op/s] or [-26.102%; -24.914%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+20.480%; +20.488%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-66633.749op/s; -65659.991op/s] or [-32.967%; -32.485%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.883%; +19.892%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-78303.815op/s; -75921.449op/s] or [-26.047%; -25.255%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.228%; +19.237%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-63922.574op/s; -61316.032op/s] or [-28.038%; -26.895%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-54950.951op/s; -53391.758op/s] or [-30.264%; -29.405%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-70182.839op/s; -66768.398op/s] or [-25.248%; -24.020%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-55962.183op/s; -52384.806op/s] or [-26.756%; -25.046%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+16.212%; +16.220%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49771.252op/s; -48465.991op/s] or [-30.364%; -29.568%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+16.125%; +16.134%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-64903.168op/s; -61282.598op/s] or [-25.845%; -24.403%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+15.691%; +15.701%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-44268.789op/s; -42560.207op/s] or [-23.447%; -22.542%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56419.346op/s; -55077.334op/s] or [-31.555%; -30.805%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-68394.193op/s; -64794.760op/s] or [-25.141%; -23.818%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-53669.887op/s; -50894.139op/s] or [-25.858%; -24.520%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+11.727%; +11.737%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-38171.644op/s; -37611.715op/s] or [-29.910%; -29.472%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+10.631%; +10.640%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-38650.465op/s; -37150.937op/s] or [-21.759%; -20.915%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+10.443%; +10.451%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-28320.665op/s; -26018.490op/s] or [-19.615%; -18.020%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+14.682%; +14.690%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-44337.859op/s; -43528.952op/s] or [-30.672%; -30.112%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+14.401%; +14.409%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-53487.472op/s; -51377.573op/s] or [-23.591%; -22.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+14.051%; +14.059%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-41000.251op/s; -38450.009op/s] or [-23.518%; -22.055%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +336 bytes] or [+18.256%; +18.264%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49666.328op/s; -48204.930op/s] or [-30.569%; -29.670%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.519%; +18.527%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59628.887op/s; -54358.496op/s] or [-22.812%; -20.796%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+17.943%; +17.952%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-50998.610op/s; -49149.356op/s] or [-25.571%; -24.644%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+336 bytes; +337 bytes] or [+19.089%; +19.097%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59420.244op/s; -57876.103op/s] or [-32.383%; -31.541%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+19.549%; +19.556%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72623.938op/s; -68644.077op/s] or [-25.668%; -24.261%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+279 bytes; +280 bytes] or [+18.918%; +18.926%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-51776.898op/s; -49052.126op/s] or [-24.581%; -23.287%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+401 bytes; +402 bytes] or [+10.304%; +10.317%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-21376.549op/s; -20771.060op/s] or [-25.346%; -24.628%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+343 bytes; +344 bytes] or [+10.484%; +10.497%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-21354.631op/s; -18880.248op/s] or [-17.949%; -15.870%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+343 bytes; +344 bytes] or [+9.905%; +9.916%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-20380.417op/s; -18974.459op/s] or [-20.722%; -19.293%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+308.480ms; +316.100ms] or [+153.079%; +156.860%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-47.311op/s; -42.964op/s] or [-8.512%; -7.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+381.646ms; +383.352ms] or [+301.523%; +302.872%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+88.729op/s; +91.621op/s] or [+11.699%; +12.080%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+398.029ms; +400.245ms] or [+352.240%; +354.202%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.710KB; +4.710KB] or [+99.147%; +99.162%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60435.298op/s; -60062.432op/s] or [-47.022%; -46.732%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.831KB; +3.832KB] or [+81.036%; +81.049%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.824ms; -11.643ms] or [-7.390%; -5.438%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-59829.809op/s; -57044.718op/s] or [-43.672%; -41.639%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.559KB; +4.560KB] or [+98.600%; +98.615%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49254.745op/s; -46967.666op/s] or [-44.532%; -42.464%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.331KB; +1.331KB] or [+107.684%; +107.699%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-270517.960op/s; -266745.304op/s] or [-27.621%; -27.236%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+495 bytes; +496 bytes] or [+40.520%; +40.530%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.794ms; -21.937ms] or [-11.949%; -9.783%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-76275.157op/s; -52128.403op/s] or [-8.149%; -5.569%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.296KB; +1.296KB] or [+107.272%; +107.287%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-155950.459op/s; -140125.680op/s] or [-22.407%; -20.133%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72895.986op/s; -72116.694op/s] or [-49.058%; -48.534%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73393.611op/s; -70506.107op/s] or [-46.699%; -44.862%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56476.846op/s; -53847.111op/s] or [-44.991%; -42.896%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+327882.684op/s; +349465.540op/s] or [+10.933%; +11.653%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-18.861ms; -14.524ms] or [-8.694%; -6.695%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.757KB] or [-42.326%; -42.318%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.164ms; +300.831ms] or [+149.982%; +150.315%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+966.175op/s; +983.879op/s] or [+10.671%; +10.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.116ms; +302.383ms] or [+150.845%; +152.492%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2291.245op/s; +2505.375op/s] or [+17.525%; +19.162%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.073ms; +302.521ms] or [+151.154%; +152.386%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1908.168op/s; +2038.015op/s] or [+18.422%; +19.676%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.617ms; +298.127ms] or [+145.687%; +146.428%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+570.200op/s; +585.437op/s] or [+15.116%; +15.520%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.080ms; +303.429ms] or [+147.187%; +148.335%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2558.410op/s; +2655.960op/s] or [+37.169%; +38.586%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.463ms; +300.327ms] or [+149.671%; +150.103%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1415.958op/s; +1436.852op/s] or [+28.106%; +28.520%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-146.176µs; -141.952µs] or [-30.012%; -29.145%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+848.639op/s; +877.473op/s] or [+41.333%; +42.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-137.866µs; -111.156µs] or [-31.620%; -25.494%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+849.445op/s; +972.759op/s] or [+36.930%; +42.292%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-142.047µs; -120.053µs] or [-30.434%; -25.722%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+771.722op/s; +854.477op/s] or [+35.624%; +39.444%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-127.208µs; -122.112µs] or [-34.345%; -32.969%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1339.398op/s; +1405.936op/s] or [+49.605%; +52.069%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-102.839µs; -79.260µs] or [-32.831%; -25.304%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1193.190op/s; +1394.244op/s] or [+37.195%; +43.463%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-135.995µs; -113.569µs] or [-37.203%; -31.068%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1298.709op/s; +1437.259op/s] or [+46.605%; +51.577%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.604ms; +300.397ms] or [+149.533%; +149.929%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+409.529ms; +415.777ms] or [+444.970%; +451.759%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+819.831op/s; +1001.630op/s] or [+6.737%; +8.231%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+366.412ms; +370.595ms] or [+278.213%; +281.389%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.842KB; +2.847KB] or [+5.049%; +5.058%]
  • unstable execution_time [+307.374ms; +359.141ms] or [+141.328%; +165.129%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-534.001op/s; -486.209op/s] or [-48.386%; -44.055%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+199.701ms; +332.929ms] or [+85.104%; +141.880%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-665.943op/s; -582.461op/s] or [-44.419%; -38.850%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+349.927ms; +360.749ms] or [+209.297%; +215.770%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-454.656op/s; -420.898op/s] or [-31.657%; -29.307%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+0.192op/s; +102.919op/s] or [+0.036%; +19.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+344 bytes; +345 bytes] or [+43.016%; +43.027%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.278ms; +303.908ms] or [+152.221%; +153.042%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-122658.181op/s; -121231.780op/s] or [-39.469%; -39.010%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+36.352%; +36.364%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.449ms; +304.321ms] or [+151.558%; +152.496%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-231147.235op/s; -226671.834op/s] or [-36.443%; -35.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+36.352%; +36.364%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.648ms; +304.779ms] or [+151.535%; +153.108%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-173688.255op/s; -166225.401op/s] or [-36.588%; -35.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+344 bytes; +345 bytes] or [+40.157%; +40.170%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.528ms; +301.888ms] or [+150.413%; +151.598%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-111368.345op/s; -109916.197op/s] or [-37.310%; -36.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+37.491%; +37.506%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.105ms; +301.373ms] or [+147.894%; +149.015%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-251095.250op/s; -247520.790op/s] or [-40.456%; -39.881%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+34.277%; +34.289%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.528ms; +305.192ms] or [+152.321%; +154.685%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-167480.981op/s; -159364.960op/s] or [-36.166%; -34.414%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+345 bytes; +346 bytes] or [+39.947%; +39.959%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.021ms; +304.597ms] or [+152.089%; +152.880%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-154003.733op/s; -152339.169op/s] or [-39.952%; -39.520%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+31.857%; +31.871%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.713ms; +302.075ms] or [+149.379%; +150.557%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-160821.857op/s; -155555.284op/s] or [-31.934%; -30.888%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+31.857%; +31.871%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.543ms; +302.909ms] or [+148.523%; +150.695%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-148649.738op/s; -143464.928op/s] or [-35.186%; -33.959%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+352 bytes; +353 bytes] or [+21.841%; +21.851%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-78292.630op/s; -76635.038op/s] or [-31.484%; -30.817%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+295 bytes; +296 bytes] or [+17.369%; +17.379%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-95577.508op/s; -83718.582op/s] or [-26.220%; -22.966%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+295 bytes; +296 bytes] or [+17.287%; +17.299%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-65518.669op/s; -59853.719op/s] or [-23.916%; -21.848%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+22.001µs; +68.649µs] or [+5.434%; +16.957%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-349.053op/s; -127.246op/s] or [-14.046%; -5.121%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.715KB; -19.693KB] or [-7.192%; -7.184%]
  • unstable execution_time [-28106.301ns; +29825.059ns] or [-5.555%; +5.895%]
  • unstable throughput [-106.638op/s; +95.326op/s] or [-5.321%; +4.757%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-15.323KB; -15.305KB] or [-5.586%; -5.579%]
  • unstable execution_time [-41.487µs; +23.878µs] or [-7.189%; +4.138%]
  • unstable throughput [-54.307op/s; +126.092op/s] or [-3.103%; +7.204%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+8.429µs; +13.134µs] or [+19.923%; +31.044%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-5676.653op/s; -3796.700op/s] or [-23.897%; -15.983%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-13.299µs; -5.431µs] or [-20.632%; -8.427%]
  • unstable throughput [+1292.348op/s; +2996.740op/s] or [+7.929%; +18.386%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+355 bytes; +356 bytes] or [+7.866%; +7.877%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.471ms; +302.553ms] or [+152.380%; +152.927%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-409.942op/s; -387.952op/s] or [-6.850%; -6.482%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+294 bytes; +295 bytes] or [+6.811%; +6.822%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+303.599ms; +306.033ms] or [+154.531%; +155.770%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+294 bytes; +295 bytes] or [+6.811%; +6.822%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.314ms; +300.438ms] or [+149.343%; +150.406%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-512.771op/s; -447.265op/s] or [-6.532%; -5.697%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+344 bytes; +345 bytes] or [+33.073%; +33.085%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-142551.023op/s; -141787.093op/s] or [-39.462%; -39.251%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+27.688%; +27.700%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-170035.999op/s; -159114.596op/s] or [-32.184%; -30.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+27.688%; +27.699%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-144737.977op/s; -136728.065op/s] or [-34.255%; -32.359%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+352 bytes; +353 bytes] or [+17.278%; +17.290%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.219ms; +299.867ms] or [+148.635%; +149.457%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-41482.085op/s; -40355.313op/s] or [-27.391%; -26.647%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+296 bytes; +296 bytes] or [+18.502%; +18.513%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.784ms; +303.661ms] or [+151.542%; +152.484%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-38613.601op/s; -36766.942op/s] or [-16.792%; -15.989%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+295 bytes; +296 bytes] or [+17.957%; +17.966%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.630ms; +305.168ms] or [+153.475%; +154.762%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-33889.732op/s; -31989.961op/s] or [-19.087%; -18.017%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.305ms; +300.303ms] or [+149.295%; +149.793%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61109039.852op/s; +61485690.533op/s] or [+44.503%; +44.778%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+425.880ms; +432.246ms] or [+529.657%; +537.575%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.952ms; +300.998ms] or [+149.609%; +150.131%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-86755.391op/s; -74375.932op/s] or [-9.682%; -8.300%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-101317.469op/s; -89216.354op/s] or [-9.274%; -8.167%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+50378.378op/s; +58139.884op/s] or [+5.003%; +5.774%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-38246.568op/s; -33484.507op/s] or [-8.521%; -7.460%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+31909.864op/s; +39224.555op/s] or [+5.794%; +7.122%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+344 bytes; +345 bytes] or [+56.547%; +56.561%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-368383.446op/s; -362449.324op/s] or [-53.915%; -53.047%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+44.439%; +44.453%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-384230.511op/s; -365618.168op/s] or [-42.928%; -40.849%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+287 bytes; +288 bytes] or [+44.439%; +44.451%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-310499.010op/s; -295579.372op/s] or [-43.354%; -41.270%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@MilanGarnier